Professional Learning Community with Interventions for STEM School Improvement: A Case Study of Surin Phitthayakom School, Surin Province, Thailand
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
Abstract
Professional Learning Community (PLC) is a school improvement strategy for building teacher competencies in cooperatively learning management focusing on improving student learnings and competencies. Interventions (InTs) help to facilitate PLC to increase high learning management. This research was conducted in Surin Phitthayakhom School as a STEM school in Surin Province, Thailand, which has been implementing PLC since 2018. The research objectives were to investigate and select the best practices as InTs of Teachers’ Council of Thailand to apply in developing competencies of students, teachers and principal in the school, to formulate and synthesize the mechanisms of PLC together with interventions (PLC-InTs) in order to develop the competencies of students, teachers and principal, and to study the effects of the applications of the mechanisms on the competencies. This research used experimental and qualitative methods that 49 best practices were selected by the committees of Teachers’ Council of Thailand, the mechanisms were formulated and synthesized by four educational experts, and the competencies of students, teachers and principal were evaluated using evaluation forms. The results found that the best practices as InTs, which were suitably applied to the school, were problem-based learning, 5E or inquiry-based learning, think-pair-share technique, paper walk technique, gallery walk technique, high impact practices, and co-5 steps. The mechanisms were formulated to SPK2 model (START, PERFORM and KEEN OF SUCCESS), mainly comprising five steps in PERFORM, i.e. study, plan, teach and observe, reflect, and revise. Besides, the competencies of students, teachers and principal were increased after the three-cycled PLC-InTs. Hence, PLC-InTs could increase those competencies as whole school approach.
Keywords: Interventions, Professional Learning Community, Whole School Approach
References
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2012). Distributed Leadership in Action: Leading High-performing Leadership Teams in English Schools. School Leadership & Management, 32(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2011.642354
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., & Karhanek, G. (2004). Whatever it Takes: How Professional Learning Communities Respond when Kids don’t Learn. Indiana: Solution Tree. Retrieved from http://egusdsecondaryed.pbworks.com/f/Whatever_It_Takes.pdf
DuFour, R., DuFour, R., Eaker, R., Many, T. W., & Mattos, M. (2006). Learning by Doing: A Handbook for Professional Learning Communities at Work. Bloomington, IN: Solution Tree Press.
Emihovich, C., & Battaglia, C. (2000). Creating Cultures for Collaborative Inquiry: New Challenges for School Leaders. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 3(3), 225–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120050083918
Gersten, R., Chard, D., & Baker, S. (2000). Factors Enhancing Sustained Use of Research-based Instructional Practices. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 33(5), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1177/002221940003300505
Hord, S. M. (1997). Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Austin, Texas: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory (SEDL). Retrieved from https://sedl.org/pubs/change34/plc-cha34.pdf
Jackl, A. (2011). WCPSS 2010-11 High Five Professional Learning Teams (PLT) Survey Results: Implementation Over Time. Raleigh, NC: Wake County Public School System, Evaluation and Research Department. Retrieved from https://webarchive.wcpss.net/results/reports/2011/1103hi5plt2010-11.pdf
Jackl, A., & Lougée, A. (2012). Wake County Public School System (WCPSS) Professional Learning Teams (PLTs): 2010-11 to 2011-12 School-Based Policy Study. Retrieved from https://webarchive.wcpss.net/results/reports/2012/1202plt10-11sbp.pdf
Kenan Foundation Asia, Enjoy Science. (n.d.). Chevron Enjoy Science Project: Enjoy Science. Retrieved from https://www.enjoyscience.kenan-asia.org/Th/enjoy-science/?gclid=CjwKCAiA5Y6eBhAbEiwA_2ZWIYl_-MCq8F9GVcbzbuUH5VI3u16viWV635Ba4KxU53PywYzTaCqtDBoCe7kQAvD_BwE
Knight, J. (2012). High-Impact Instruction: A Framework for Great Teaching. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
McDougal, J. L., Graney, S. B., Wright, J. A., & Ardoin, S. P. (2010). RTI in Practice: A Practical Guide to Implementing Effective Evidence-based Interventions in your School. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Mundschenk, N. A., & Fuchs, W. W. (2016). Professional Learning Communities: An Effective Mechanism for the Successful Implementation and Sustainability of Response to Intervention. SRATE Journal, 25(2), 55–64.
Rentfro, E. R. (2007). Professional Learning Communities Impact Student Success. Leadership Compass, 5(2), 1–3. Retrieved from https://www.naesp.org/sites/default/files/resources/2/Leadership_Compass/2007/LC2007v5n2a3.pdf
Teachers’ Council of Thailand. (2020). Manual of Higher Education Institution for Monitoring and Evaluating the Activity of Professional Learning Community 2020. Bangkok: Teachers’ Council of Thailand.
Teachers’ Council of Thailand. (2021). Meeting Agenda of the Board of Promotion, Support, Dissemination and Exchange of Knowledge and Body of Knowledge to Develop the Depth of Educational Professions for the 1st, 14 December 2021. Bangkok: Teachers’ Council of Thailand.
York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2004). What do we Know about Teacher Leadership? Findings from Two Decades of Scholarship. Review of Educational Research, 74(3), 255–316. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543074003255