A Model for Integrating Traditional and Modern Land-Tenure Systems: A Case Study of Dai Minority in Yunnan, China

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Wang Jing Somkid Kaewtip Bongkochmas Ek-Iem

Abstract

     The objectives of this research were to: 1) study the traditional Dai land-tenure management system, 2) compare the differences between the traditional Dai land-tenure management system and the modern system, 3) analyze the effect of the implementation of the modern land-tenure management system on the Dai community, and 4) develop a new model for integrating the traditional Dai tenure-management system with the modern system. Data were collected through documentation review, in-depth interviews, and focus group discussions. Data were validated using triangular techniques and analyzed by qualitative methods. The results showed the following: 1) traditional Dai land-tenure management derives from traditional wisdom and employs methods beneficial for land use, land allocation, and the ecological environment; 2) traditional Dai land-tenure management differs from the modern land system in terms of land rights, land use, and mechanisms; 3) while implementation of the modern system has changed land-use and land-management mechanisms in the Dai area, villagers will still adopt traditional methods to reduce threats from externalities; and 4) traditional land-tenure management compensates for shortcomings in the modern system and helps to improve land use, social equity, and sustainable development. In order to solve the integration of the two system is equilibrium, stable and sustainable, and finally play the optimal function of system. This study recommends the following: reducing external uncertainties, improving rural social security and local policy development, enhancing adaptability and coordination within community organizations, and giving more autonomy to community organizations to protect traditional Dai culture. To this end, a new model is established to integrate the traditional land-tenure management system with the modern system.


Keywords: Modern and Traditional Land Tenure, Land Utilization, Management System, Dai Minority, Community

References

Adams, B. N., & Sydie, R. A. (2001). Sociological Theory. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications.

Bin, H., Jijun, K., Aiguo, C., & Li, L. (2009). Research on Land Resources Management under the Influence of the Traditional Culture of the Dai People in Xishuangbanna. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Sciences, 18, 8718-8721. Retrieved from http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=30811663

Bromley, D. W. (1991). Environment and Economy. Property Rights and Public Policy. Oxford: Blackwell.

Chen, X. W., & Han, J. (2014). Research on the Development Path of “Agriculture, Rural Areas and Farmers” With Chinese Characteristics. Beijing, China: Tsinghua University Press.

Deshun, Z. (2010). Economic and Sociological Analysis of Farmland Property Rights System. (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/Detail.aspx?dbname=CDFD0911&filename=2010208862.nh&v=&filetitle=%e5%86%9c%e5%9c%b0%e4%ba%a7%e6%9d%83%e5%88%b6%e5%ba%a6%e7%9a%84%e7%bb%8f%e6%b5%8e%e7%a4%be%e4%bc%9a%e5%ad%a6%e5%88%86%e6%9e%90

Eggertsson, T. (1990). Economic Behavior and Institutions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Fulin, C. (2000). Stepping Into the 21st Century of China’s Rural Land System Reform. Beijing, China: China Economic Publishing House.

Haichao, Z., & Tingjia, L. (2018). Ecological Anthropological Investigation of the Traditional Rice Production System of the Dai Nationality. Social Sciences in Yunnan, 2, 155-161. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=YSHX201802023&dbname=CJFDLAST2018

Han, C. F. (2014, December 22). The Reform of “Three Rights Separation” is a Major Institutional Innovation. People’s Daily. Retrieved from http://en.people.cn/

He, X. M. (2017). On the Problems and Perfection of the Land Management System in China. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 14, 16-17. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/KCMS/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFQ&dbname=CJFDLAST2017&filename=NCJI201714011&v=MTI5OTdXTTFGckNVUkxPZllPWnBGeS9sVzd6S0t5N0JaN0c0SDliTnE0OUVaWVI4ZVgxTHV4WVM3RGgxVDNxVHI=

Hongyan, L. (2018). National Centralization and the Deficiency of Collective Land Ownership. Rural Economy and Science-Technology, 29(9), 33-34. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=NCJI201809015&dbname=CJFDLAST2018

Hopkins, J. (1998). Signs of the Post-Rural: Marketing Myths of a Symbolic Countryside. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 80(2), 65–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0435-3684.1998.00030.x

Jiang, L., & Jing-Zhou, S. (2016). Analysis and Enlightenment of the Changes of China’s Agricultural Land System. Seeking Truth, 43(2), 69-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.19667/j.cnki.cn23-1070/c.2016.02.009

Kitchin, R., & Tate, N. J. (2000). Conducting Research into Human Geography: Theory, Methodology and Practice. London: Prentice Hall

Li, Y. (2007). Analysis of the Status Quo of Rural Land System in China and Exploration of Reform Countermeasures. Journal of Northeast Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 5, 14-17. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=DBNY200705007&dbname=CJFD2007

Liang, J. Y. (1983). The History of Dai. Sichuan, China: Sichuan National Publishing House.

Libecap, G. D. (1989). Distributional Issues in Contracting for Property Rights. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 145(1), 6-24.

Lingyun, L. (2014). Analysis on Problems and Countermeasures of Land Management System. Scientific and Technological Innovation, 17, 278-279. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=HLKX201417294&dbname=CJFD2014

Mei, Z. (2005). The Formation Mechanism of Moral Internalization and Its Realization Ways. Jilin Education Science, 9, 16-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.13980/j.cnki.xdjykx.gjyj.2005.09.004

Ming, L. (2009). A Survey of Environmental Change and Cultural Adaptation. Journal of Hebei University of Economics and Business (Comprehensive Edition), 9(2), 54-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.14178/j.cnki.issn1673-1573.2009.02.018

Ming, Y. (1997). A Probe into the Legal System of the Feudal Economy of the Yi Nationality. Inquiry into Economic Problems, 10, 42-44. Retrieved from http://navi.cnki.net/KNavi/JournalDetail?pcode=CJFD&pykm=JJWS&Year=1997&Issue=10&Entry=

Mingyong, H. (2018). Urban-Rural Dual Land System: Logical Starting Point, Evolution and Future Reform. Review of Economic Research, 38, 31-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.16110/j.cnki.issn2095-3151.2018.38.005

Parsons, T. (1951). The Social System. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

Qian, W. (2002). The Structure and Evolution of China’s Rural Land Property Rights: The Perspective of Institutional Change. Journal of Social Science, 2, 18-22. Retrieved from http://navi.cnki.net/KNavi/JournalDetail?pcode=CJFD&pykm=CSKF&Year=2007&Issue=19&Entry=

Saunders, M. N. K., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2004). Research Method for Business Students (3rd ed.). New York: Prentice Hall.

Silverman, D. (2013). Doing Qualitative Research (4th Ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Wei, C. (2007). The Evolution of China’s Land System. Urban Development, 19, 53-55. Retrieved from http://navi.cnki.net/KNavi/JournalDetail?pcode=CJFD&pykm=CSKF&Year=2007&Issue=19&Entry=

Wenqing, K. (2008). Superego: The Ideal Type of Internalization of Law: Freud’s Moral Theory and Its Significance. Studies in Ethics, 6, 91-99. http://dx.doi.org/10.15995/j.cnki.llxyj.2008.06.003

Xiu-Ling, W., Bo-Chuan, L., & Xi-Bin, Z. (2009). The Research on the Traditional Land System of Dai Nationality in Xishuangbanna. Journal of Yunnan Agricultural University (Social Science), 6, 114-118. Retrieved from http://qikan.cqvip.com/Qikan/Article/Detail?id=32605100

Xudong, G. (2012). Thoughts on the Problems and Perfection of China’s Land Management System. China Land Science, 2, 31-33. https://dx.doi.org/10.13708/j.cnki.cn11-2640.2012.02.008

Ying, L. S. (2014). Rural Collective Ownership and Reform of Three Rights Separation. China Rural Findings, 3, 82-89. Retrieved from http://mall.cnki.net/magazine/magalist/XCFX2014.htm

Young, O. R., King, L. A., & Schroeder, H. (2012). Institutions and Environmental Change: Principal Findings, Applications, and Research Frontiers. Beijing, China: Higher Education Press.

Yuan, C. (2006). China’s Rural Land System Change: A Property Rights Perspective. Journal of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law, 5, 18-22. Retrieved from http://navi.cnki.net/KNavi/JournalDetail?pcode=CJFD&pykm=ZLCJ

Yun, L., Zhao, W., & Hailong, X. (2001). Tradition and Change of the Use of Natural Resources by the Yi People in Mandan Village, Xishuangbanna Nature Reserve. Chinese Journal of Ecology, 20(4), 42-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.13292/j.1000-4890.2001.0076

Zhang, C. C. (2006). Research on the Culture of the Dai Village Community. Beijing, China: Central University for Nationalities Press.

Zhaobing, L. (2019). Measures to Improve the Rural Land Management System. Marketing Management Review, 5, 184. Retrieved from http://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CJFD&filename=XIXY201905143&dbname=CJFDTEMP

Zhi, J. L. (2015). Talking about the Problems and Countermeasures of the Land Management System. ChengShiJiansheLiLun Yan Jiu. Retrieved from http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=csjsllyj2015153014

Zhizhong, P. (2009). Analysis on the Evolution of Rural Land Property Right System in China. Journal of Socialist Theory Guide, 2, 52-55. Retrieved from http://navi.cnki.net/KNavi/JournalDetail?pcode=CJFD&pykm=LLDK&Year=2009&Issue=02&Entry=

Section
Research Articles

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

How to Cite
JING, Wang; KAEWTIP, Somkid; EK-IEM, Bongkochmas. A Model for Integrating Traditional and Modern Land-Tenure Systems: A Case Study of Dai Minority in Yunnan, China. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), [S.l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 1-18, feb. 2020. ISSN 2539-5521. Available at: <http://www.journal.nu.ac.th/JCDR/article/view/Vol-13-No-1-2020-1-18>. Date accessed: 31 mar. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.14456/jcdr-hs.2020.1.